I NTERNATIONAL sporting events are costly and bring problems to the hosting country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
: It is undeniable that international sports events bring name and fame for a country but on the other hand, organizing such events is a challenging task as it also requires huge amount of money. I agree with the statement partially as these type of events has both pros and cons for the hosting country. This essay will explain my viewpoint before reaching the conclusion in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, hosting sports events proves beneficial for the country. To be precise, when sports events are organized, then more emphasis is laid on the improvement of infrastructure that also becomes beneficial for the residents. To exemplify, hosting country emphasizes a lot on the better condition of roads, proper lighting system, cleanliness which in turns improves the living conditions of local residents. Thus, citizens are also benefitted by such events. Moreover, sport events also improves the economic condition of a people of hosting country as they sell local craft material to tourists which become a source of earning their livelihood. Hence, these events have a plethora of advantages for organizing country.
On the other hand, organizing these events also has some drawbacks. At the onset, such events demand a large amount of money which becomes difficult for a hosting country to arrange. The money that is spent on these events can be used for providing basic needs to native people. Furthermore, it is also dangerous from the environment point of view as it enhances pollution in the surrounding. For instance, arrival of people makes use of more vehicles that increase air pollution .throwing garbage anywhere, spitting on the roads also increases the worries of local people. Thusly, such events also bring problems with it.
To conclude, I opine that if these events would be organized properly then they would not become a source of income for hosting country but also increases the standard of living of its natives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | dilbagh | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | dilbagh | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | dilbagh | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-09 | sandhu harman | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-26 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 84 | view |
- the future all the cars buses will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantage of drivless vehicles out weigh the disadvantages 790293 61
- the future all the cars buses will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantage of drivless vehicles out weigh the disadvantages 790293 61
- I NTERNATIONAL sporting events are costly and bring problems to the hosting country To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- the future all the cars buses will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantage of drivless vehicles out weigh the disadvantages 67
- Q the chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crimei Manchester city centre from 2003 2012 Summarise the information
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...events bring name and fame for a country but on the other hand, organizing such e...
^^^
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o becomes beneficial for the residents. To exemplify, hosting country emphasizes a...
^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ore vehicles that increase air pollution .throwing garbage anywhere, spitting on t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, then, thus, for instance, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17034700315 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73586532201 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526813880126 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2986839581 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197818891537 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763338900695 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593833822119 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13469708604 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355141961328 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.