If old people are no longer physically mentally or financially able to look after themselves younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

If old people are no longer physically, mentally or financially able to look after themselves, younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The question of whether younger family members should bear legal responsibility for providing support to elderly individuals who are no longer physically, mentally, or financially capable of self-care remains a subject of debate. While recognizing the moral obligation associated with this duty, I am of the opinion that mandating it through legislation may not be a viable approach.

Proponents of the viewpoint that younger family members should be legally obliged to assist their elderly relatives argue that it is an inherent moral duty to care for one's own kin. They contend that the elderly have made significant contributions to the welfare of their families over their lifetimes and, therefore, deserve support during their time of need. By establishing legal obligations, this ensures that the elderly receive the essential care and financial assistance necessary to alleviate their burdens and safeguard their overall well-being. Supporters of this measure further emphasize that it can serve as a preventive measure against instances where children neglect or mistreat their parents who are physically incapable of tending to their own needs.

Notwithstanding these arguments, I am inclined to believe that imposing the responsibility of supporting the elderly on younger family members through legal means may be impractical. It is crucial to recognize that each family's circumstances and capacities vary significantly, which means that enforcing such obligations can unduly burden younger family members who may already be facing their own financial and personal challenges. Instead, society should focus on establishing comprehensive government programs or community services that guarantee the well-being of the elderly. By adopting a collective approach, we can ensure that the elderly receive the care and support they rightly deserve without unfairly encumbering younger family members.

In conclusion, while valid arguments exist in favor of legal obligations on younger family members, I contend that implementing such policies may not be advisable. Rather, I believe that a holistic support framework encompassing government initiatives and community-driven services represents a more equitable and effective approach to ensure the welfare of the elderly.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-03 hien3112 56 view
2023-08-16 thuthao2000 87 view
2023-07-30 Dương Viết Phương Huyền 61 view
2023-07-28 cupinsiuway 84 view
2023-06-19 Amanda Helen 78 view
Essays by user Amanda Helen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether younger family members should bear lega...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84431137725 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13457468629 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562874251497 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.5649003606 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 162.666666667 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229753358416 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940177920031 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728636182867 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153462411828 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551600523665 0.056905535591 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether younger family members should bear lega...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84431137725 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13457468629 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562874251497 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.5649003606 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 162.666666667 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229753358416 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940177920031 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728636182867 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153462411828 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551600523665 0.056905535591 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.