If old people are no longer physically, mentally or financially able to look after themselves, younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Physical and mental well-being seem to stem from the fact that aging has a detrimental indirect impact on senior citizens earning potential. While it is undeniably the duty of the younger family generation to take supplementary care of the elderly, governmental authorities should also take their part in assisting them in the last period of their lives.
Above any external support from society, family members, who are believed to be flesh and blood, should look after the elderly. As a matter of fact, this has become a social norm, and humans who do not obey are regarded as disrespectful. Furthermore, the elderly in the family are able to play an essential role in raising the children; hence, being cared for by the younger generation as they become older is completely appropriate. In contrast, in Western countries, an indirect method applied by some households is deciding to place the elderly in nursing homes for medical treatment and care. The author prefers this measurement, although many nations respecting young people's direct home duties continue to reject it.
Aside from the support of their own families, elderly citizens deserve to receive government assistance due to their decades-long devotion to the nation. In fact, The United States is an excellent example of a country with an enormous financial budget for aiding the elderly. American nationals get a substantial pension or grant in their old age, permitting them to pay for the rest of their lives with or without the help of their offspring. Another reason behind this could be mitigating the burden of financing a great number of the young without employment. Besides, Family members may lack the necessary medical or caregiving skills to provide adequate care, particularly for individuals with complex medical needs.
In conclusion, young individuals are considered to be in charge of caring for elderly family members. This obligation, however, should not rest only on the young; instead, they ought to seek government aid as a means of honoring older individuals for their dedication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | hien3112 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | thuthao2000 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | Dương Viết Phương Huyền | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | cupinsiuway | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Amanda Helen | 78 | view |
- the charts below show the proportion of expenditure by student on average at one university in 2000 and 2010 70
- Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 89
- If old people are no longer physically mentally or financially able to look after themselves younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries many people suffer from health problems due to eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, hence, however, look, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23723723724 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83259760552 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597597597598 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4101406997 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194307703803 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636087716583 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405279534947 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114355925694 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268806688304 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.