Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
It is believed that increasing the payment of petrol is the best method to crack raising traffic and pollution issues. Personally, I can just partly agree with the opinion because of the following reasons.
Granted, it is true that raising the payment of petrol is the way to reduce pollution and traffic-related issues, yet that method is just suitable for developed countries. For example, with the development of technology and science, applying these achievements to increase environmental protection conditions is easy with people living in developed countries. However, on the other hand, the reality is so harsh with people who live in underprivileged countries. If the price of petrol was raised, the governments of poor countries would pay more money than the past, so that the amount of money which would be spent on improving citizens’ living conditions was less than previous. As a consequence, poor living conditions play the main reason which lead to crucial pollutants. Hence, if people want to reduce pollution, the price of petrol needs to be kept on equal terms with every country, and the government has to create an opportunity for poorer countries by selling promotions.
Turning to traffic issues, raising the payment of petrol is just an alternative method because if the governments want to decrease traffic-related problems, they need to develop both the construction of traffic and awareness of transportation. Firstly, improving and developing the construction of transportation plays an important role in keeping comfortable and safe feelings when people join in traffic. For example, the governments can set more alarms in the accident hotspots, a roundabout at the crossroad, and increase highways or subways to reduce and separate the enormous number of regular transports. Secondly, apart from the construction of traffic, the governments have to focus on social awareness of using transports. Nowadays, most accidental deaths come from the lack of traffic laws such as wearing wrong helmets, driving overspeed, and using alcohol drinks when participating in traffic.
In conclusion, rising payment of petrol is just a standby method, if people really want to decrease traffic and pollution issues, the price need to be kept on equal terms and the transport construction and awareness of traffic users will have to improve.
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The given charts give information about the number of students at a university in the UK from 1991 to 2001 government spending and the types of family economic background they came from in 1991 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The spread of multinational companies and the increase of globalization produces positive effects for everyone To what extent to you agree or disagree 11
- In the future of all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d pollution issues, the price need to be kept on equal terms and the transport co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, apart from, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40810810811 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07726767329 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6355806364 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.928571429 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7857142857 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227904509872 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827511694677 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858082310867 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161394496441 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356066811704 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.