It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
A substantial number of people have addressed the question of how people have unique talents. Some believe that these talents are genetic from parents, while others think people can develop their abilities by learning and practicing over time. I firmly endorse the view that humans can be a genius without a natural cause.
On the one hand, some logical explanations are supporting the idea that talent is innate. Firstly, some people have gifts because they have inherited certain genes from their parents, maybe from their mother or father. For example, Paolo Maldini was one of the world soccer legends played for A.C Milan and Italian national team, whose father was Cesare Maldini, who also was a successful football player and a head coach for the Italian national team. Secondly, at a young age, some people discovered their abilities and had good conditions to advance their skills. Lionel Messi, Ronaldinho, Neymar, Zinedine Zidane are some typical examples that can be found in the soccer world.
On the other hand, I agree that without any natural influence, people can become talented simply by learning and numerous time practicing. The main reason for this notion is that many people are enough enthusiastic and passionate about improving and developing their skills. The most well-known proof for this view is Cristiano Ronaldo, the world’s best soccer player along with Lionel Messi. Raised in poverty and had no talent, he had a big passion for soccer and had an iron will to pursue his soccer dream, which leads him to a successful career. Furthermore, there are numerous teaching systems where individuals can be taught and practiced various skills, so we can find several shreds of evidence to support this view from our experience.
In conclusion, while it is accurate to say that talent is innate, it appears to me that learning and practicing can also help peoples’ growth of abilities and become talented.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-05-26 | AnnaAlysia | 56 | view |
2024-05-03 | annaalysia007 | 56 | view |
2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
2023-09-04 | writingme | 67 | view |
2023-08-26 | Trinh Bella | 80 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: C
...f the world soccer legends played for A.C Milan and Italian national team, whose ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1167192429 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49943022097 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602523659306 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2699549754 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245134252612 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834043668016 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324556663213 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145601498596 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370124150496 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.