In many cities, the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?
Although the utilisation of video recording in public areas is becoming increasingly popular in order to curb crime rates in several cities, there are those believing that these methods invade personal privacy. However, others, myself included, hardly agree with this statement since this use could bring such benefits in many aspects, outweighing its considered disadvantages.
When considering installing CCTV cameras in public areas, the authorities carefully calculated how this solution would bring advantages. This means surveillance devices are as well-known as machine eyes because these are set in many undiscovered spaces, leading to the prevention of would-be criminals from enshrining illegal activities. For instance, Japan is a modernised nation where devices are upgraded continuously to conserve their citizens, meaning video cameras not only record all people’s actions but also identify biometric data by scanning. Moreover, the most valuable authentic evidence to convict crime is some recorded videos making it more obvious.
Granted, personal privates might be a serious hazard if records are hacked. People claim that if their own information is leaked to online platforms, even several unidentified websites, they could face lots of risks, such as cyberbullying, or blackmailing. However, any mentioned cases happen with the lowest times, even though this does not exist because people working for the governments make them well-qualified experts leading to the creation of high-security systems. For example, the USA has a secure organisation named the FBI, there are those who take the responsibility of protection both in life and online society. This could lead to safety for international travellers and Americans.
In conclusion, compared to certain benefits conferred by setting CCTV cameras in public places, I believe that its disadvantages are insignificant, considering the positive effects are a priority to societies.
- The maps show the town in 1995 and present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks 89
- The maps show the town in 1995 and present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The maps show the town of Gotham in 1995 and present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people focus on news in their country while others think it is more important to be aware of international news Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82986111111 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06934821053 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694444444444 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5042473977 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.916666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199847112544 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617317269556 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047833227939 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117340453616 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559930004917 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.