In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, companies are working on a national and international level, which impact their profit margin, and they give a significant amount of wages to their administration. However, others argue that this is totally unfair to those workers who work the whole day. I believe that the high wages of top management are reasonable although companies also provide welfare to workers. In the course of the essay, I will discuss both sides.
The immense amount of salaries to the top leadership of country-level industry and multinational industry are justified due to the fact, these are providing the vital number of jobs if their management does not job properly then it will be closed and employees will lose their positions. For example, an unskilled person posted on a chief operating officer position with a low salary package is less risky than a skilled person with a huge pay package. These benefits are essential to attract the new generation to do efforts to achieve these positions. If these posts do not give extra facilities then nobody is ready to take the responsibilities. In addition, it is a law of nature that leaders always get back more than others.
On the other side, people argue that Governments should regulate the level of income. In different companies, the same type of worker getting different incomes for the same task. For instance, Google is one of the biggest groups in the world and its CEO is paid three times higher than Similar companies CEO. Governments also implement new laws that give more benefits to their workers.
In conclusion, enormous salaries are reasonable according to their responsibilities however their wages will be the same for the same job and distribute profit to lower labourers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-08 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | BoyClazz | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | lucynton | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | quynh123445 | 84 | view |
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2004 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... do efforts to achieve these positions. If these posts do not give extra facilitie...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08013937282 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84597545613 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581881533101 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.452885266 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182795597561 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577393906039 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458128934386 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967997090524 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027664081004 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.