Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, thanks to the development of technology, museums have become a more appealling tourist attraction than in the past. It is true that a significant number of museums require entrance fee while other services are free. Despite the fact that this tendency might bring back those museums a considerable amount of money, which can be use for upgrading or renewing facilities, I believe that the drawbacks are far greater since this might prevent some people from entering the museums, as well as exacerbate the gap between different social levels.
To commence with, this tendency might create a barrier for those who want to go to museums but are financially uncapabled. Students who are passionate about history or science could act as an illustration, since they are small children and are not monetary independent, they would not be able to pay such fees. As a result, the number of visitors might decrease rapidly, which means those museums would receive less revenue leading to the edge of closing for lack of income.
Furthermore, since not only young children would not be able to afford those fees, but also the underpriviledge are in the same situation, the social gap could become greater. This is because only people with high income could enter the museums, and poor people are abandone from approaching new technology or historical masterpieces. Consequently, citizens from all around the world might feel angry and start several sacks standing for their human rights and human equality.
Even though entrance fees might bring them a slight increase in revenue, as certain visitors would not be able to pay those fees, this might bring back some adverse effects that have been mentioned.
In conclusion, I contend that although this tendency might create extra revenue for the museums, its demerits are more significant such as preventing students from entering museums for educational purposes or exacerbating social gap between the priviledge and the poor
- The maps show the changes of Bell Hill Farm in 1976 and 2006 Bell Hill Farm in 1976 Bill Hill Environmental Centre 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world To what extent is this a positive or negative trend 61
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food clothing or medicine To what extent do you agree or disagree disagree 89
- Nowadays many people travel to foreign countries for pleasure Some believe this travel has a negative impact on the countries travelled to To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23197492163 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70576682729 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.5167707404 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.727272727 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14528254331 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662022712255 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535440647448 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861495059528 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557765967832 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.