Many people aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the causes of this How to overcome this problem
Achieving balance work life has been a topic of broad interest to the general public. There are two major reasons behind this trend which will be elaborated below with solutions.
It is understandable why striving for both accomplishing work and maintaining fulfilled private life is difficult to attain. The first point of view is that as labor market become increasingly competitive, workers would have to bear heavier workload thereby sacrifice their time spent with families. In addition to seek the security of employability, employees are constantly dealing with up-to-minute issues which could be attributed to the invent of technological breakthroughs for the time being.
Similarly, distractions originated from one’s personal life could subsequently result in deteriorating productivity in the workplace.
Given these afore-mentioned facts, three strategies could be deployed to tackle the phenomenon. First, job seekers could negotiate their perks and right which clarify terms that restrict the amount of work and the time frame to reasonable level. Secondly, apart from urgent circumstances, individuals should turn off their phone when staying their safe haven. This could eliminate any uninformed contacts which are possibly precursor for unnecessary annoyance. Furthermore, wage earners may shut out any unneeded distractions from their handheld devices by avoid exposure to those as much as possible. Finally, use of check list would remain people being aware of their priorities.
In sum, the fierce competition for work and technological advancements would impede people from achieving successful career and happy life. This disadvantage could be justified by restriction of technology usage and favorable contract terms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | ililmaidatuz | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-23 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-23 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-23 | trlnanhh | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | harpreet kaur bains | 87 | view |
- Employers should give their staff at least a 4 week holiday a year to make employees better at their jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
- Some people say that now they can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people consider art to be essential and others think it is not Which view do you agree with and why 84
- Interviews form the basic criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and that there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s been a topic of broad interest to the general public. There are two major reasons behind thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ute issues which could be attributed to the invent of technological breakthroughs for the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 348, Rule ID: SAFE_HAVEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'haven'.
Suggestion: haven
...turn off their phone when staying their safe haven. This could eliminate any uninformed co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83203125 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12251610268 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69140625 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7854122608 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.642857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16026998872 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542516445416 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471016619225 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088375898468 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639681372692 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.