Many people believe we should continue developing cloning technology.To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Cloning has become increasingly popular among particular demographics of society. These people claim that cloning technology must be developed at any price. This essay will argue why investing in cloning is entirely necessary despite some potential risks.
Hundreds of people believe that if we drum up our support for cloning technology, it will expand dramatically. For one thing, cloning can be our only way to treat many incurable illnesses. For instance, we can return the walking ability to many humans who sat on wheelchairs. Another thing is with cloning; we may finally be able to put an end to numerous chromosomal disorders. As an illustration, cloning provides us a useful source by which we can have children with not only any ailments but also remarkably stronger. These few instances have bolstered real excitement in humans that cloning development is beneficial, especially for the next generation.
Although much of the cloning in our everyday lives has only positive effects, some uses raise controversial issues and questions. In the first place, cloning is just like acting as GOD. An example may help clarify the point. In many religious countries, this field of study remains only theoretical, and scientists are not allowed to work on it. In the second place, even though, cloning has this power to alter damaged genes. However, it may bring some unwanted nasty mutations by itself. As things stand right now, they believe cloning has some side effects which make it unreliable.
By comparing and contrasting the pros and cons of cloning, I believe that its upside is significantly more crucial than its downside. To support my position, I would like to offer two primary arguments. Firstly, Doctor Benet, the enchanted head of the medical department of Sidney University, asserts that cloning might be our only hope for ending to selling human organs in black markets. For example, we could make a brand new kidney instead of extracting it from someone else. Secondly, as has been demonstrated before, cloning plants can bring us this chance to eradicate hunger from the earth. In other words, cloning can help humankind much more than we think it does.
This essay argued that cloning technology is meritorious. Nevertheless, the question is: Can this technique improve the health and happiness of human beings in general? Only time will tell, but in the meantime, cloning continues to influence every aspect of our every day lives.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25-44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whe 73
- What are the pros and cons of children watching television 84
- Some people regard work as the most important thing in life and have little interest in anything else others are more enthusiastic about their hobbies and leisure interests than their jobs Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 47
- The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25-44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whe 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, another thing, for example, for instance, in general, for one thing, in other words, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1675 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75019885645 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4481124258 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.68 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.56 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187680440973 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521124196072 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042665489892 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104678766766 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396340295638 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.