Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?
Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
There is no doubt in saying that foreign films are more well-known in many countries than domestically produced films. There are a host of reasons for this tendency, and I strongly believe that governments should take their responsibility for supporting local film in terms of finance.
There are several factors behind people’s favoritism towards foreign films. First and foremost, the establishment of film industries in global countries improves greatly thanks to huge investment in action, special effects, and spectacular locations as well. For example, Hollywood blockbusters like ‘Avatar’ of James Bond films, which expend a lot on imaginative plots and breath-taking backgrounds, earn substantial revenue from moviegoers around the world. Another root why these big-budget films are well-received is that these days, there is a growing trend towards discovering international culture. This means people are likely to learn other nations’ traditions, cultural activities and if they fail to afford overseas trips, experiencing through movies can be one of the best choices.
In order to solve the problem, it is essential that governments should financially support local moviemakers. Around the world, there could be talented amateur film-makers who just need to be given the opportunity to flaunt their talents. Furthermore, to attract viewers, these people need a large sum of money to pay for qualified film crews, celebrated actors, and so forth. If governments did help with these costs, they would see a rise in employment in the field of arts, income from film sales, development in their nations’ culture, and perhaps even an increase in tourist numbers. Ha Long Bay, for instance, has witnessed growth in tourism profits after appearing in the ‘King Kong’ movie.
To conclude, the phenomenon of preference for foreign films is caused by some aforementioned factors. Taking all these points into accountability, I strongly advocate that financial help from governments could help to raise the quality of local movies and allow them to compete with foreign movies which are currently dominant in the market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-10 | soomi2209 | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | soomi2209 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | trangluong610 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-16 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | mohammad.iraf | 84 | view |
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country visited Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 89
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility to solve this problem To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...omestically produced films. There are a host of reasons for this tendency, and I str...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...orting local film in terms of finance. There are several factors behind people’s fav...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, well, for example, for instance, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53048780488 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0081129147 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646341463415 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.395372746 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36908172464 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113228448525 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738768853813 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222597484146 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078541598054 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.