More and more people want to own items, such as cars, clothing and other things, that are made by famous brands. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In the meantime, it is apparent that popular brands turn to be what the growing number of societies are craving on as secondary and supplementary belongings. This issue, I personally believe, would cite more significant disadvantages which will be elaborated in the forthcoming paragraph.
Regarding the remarkable drawbacks, perhaps, we must avow that a desire to own branded goods potentially creates a greater social gap. This is because the rich people willingly spend too excessive on such products to symbolise their status which shows a common discourtesy. To exemplify, the high-class boutiques could merely be accessed by individual's certain status. Furthermore, compulsive shoppers often refers to a behavioural change which tendentiously purchase not real needs items. The frequently-launched brand is a form of marketing strategy to feed their ego. Regarding financial difficulties, they are also saddled with drippling debt.
On the other hand, we must consider that high-end brands would boost individual’s self-esteem. Since those products, for certain inhabitants, regard as the least essential needs, which come after hardworking job as a refletion of self-worth. This could foster their persistance and productivity to earn more for living. In addition, that are best at its quality and durability, well-known products deserve public interest. More and more branded items create unlimited collections which derive from top-tier raw materials to meet the expectation of modern societies. Despite the overpriced costs, the sellers ensures consumers to experience good values of offered products.
To sum up, while the possession of extra-paid brands brings some noticeable advantages, I would contradict that consumerism of those could create social conflict as well as compulsive buying behaviour.
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss views and give your own opinion 84
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 84
- Recent research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 89
- In modern times some species of animals are slowly disappearing Do you think that it is acceptable for species to become extinct What are the possible reasons of this extinction 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, well, while, in addition, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81343283582 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21241569749 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694029850746 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5330019864 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.866666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12959508522 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378348146881 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440135036761 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067637605747 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354070448902 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.