More and more people want to own items such as cars clothing and other things that are made by famous brands Do you think it is a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

More and more people want to own items, such as cars, clothing and other things, that are made by famous brands. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Many consumers are increasingly possessed in expensive things ranging from automobiles, apparels and other stuffs produced by well-known brands. I will contend with how this viewpoint initiates to greater advantages which I will elaborate in the following paragraph.

On the one hand, the benefits of owning fancy good is boosting government revenue through progressive tax. Considering that, wealthier folks may impose higher taxes on each amenity which can generate charitable donations. In 2022, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation allocated over $1 billon in global development. Furthermore, purchasing expensive as a reward of one’s hard work provides a sense of satisfaction. Besides a source of investment, this can lead individuals raising social status as their self-signaling of achievement and aspiration. The Journal of Consumer Psychology presents that luxurious stuff shapes people to be more confident and powerful.

On the other hand, we should emphasize some drawbacks of this issue that luxury-loving may inflict higher crime rate due to social inequality. The economic differences weaken solidarity and social bonds, making wealthy persons criminal targets due to social jealousy. Reported by Free Press Journal, Kim Kardashian's social media displays of affluence provoked a Paris burglar to steal her diamonds. Moreover, through flaunting-wealth and materialism, sybarite is more likely suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder. Regarding that, this influences people always feeling less and worrying about prosperity, as in Western society, which lead them to be materialistic and shopping addiction.

In summary, despite some considerable demerits, I would refute that the merits of buying branded items are more remarkable consensus, including greater state income and personal well-being.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-22 Mollymaul 80 view
2023-10-16 BoyClazz 89 view
2023-10-04 BoyClazz 89 view
2023-10-02 BoyClazz 84 view
2022-12-20 Mollymaul 84 view
Essays by user BoyClazz :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Melinda Gates Foundation allocated over billon in global development. Furthermor...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, in summary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01153846154 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20017334959 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.719230769231 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1170833137 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.642857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100994042098 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294188791456 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371060073909 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610816707472 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257838820607 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.33 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.