In the past, people wore their traditional clothes and followed their culture. These days, most people wear similar clothes and therefore look very similar to one another. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Nowadays many people are interested to wear the same type of dresses rather than ancestral clothes and old culture like past generations. However, this essay explains the positive aspects of new trends of attire in terms of uniformity, identity and disbelief of dress cultures.
Most of the young generations are often express the taste of new fashion and modern trends in clothes. Changing dress by the alteration of designers choice is the new tendency of modernization. So they are avoiding the old traditional clothes and cultural aspects of such dresses. For instance, in past, elderly people always wear sarees, blouses with cotton linen as their official and none official occasions. Thus, it makes the remembrance of old generations survival of crisis in many circumstances.
Nevertheless, wearing a uniform like clothes may precipitate togetherness, identical to the same groups, companies or agencies. Such outfits may mitigate the discrimination between society and various classes of families. For example, people may express differentiation between the types of clothes and the culture of a person if they wear traditional clothes. However, if everyone choose the same outfits would enhance uniformity and detour the attitude of the old culture. On the other hand, people may think formal dresses would envelop the old culture and it would be migrated to the new generation. Though, wearing ancestral clothes daily would mitigate the actual purpose of such clothes to the core. Simple and manageable choice of clothes would be easy to carry and use in every situation without any difficulties as a whole. Because most of the traditional dresses are unmanageable, and pattern to the form of wear makes disillusioned in recent days.
To sum up, it is good to follow old traditional dresses and transform past cultures into new ones. Nonetheless, being identical wears in day to day life would be more beneficial irrespective of special events.
- Some people think that in this modern world getting old is entirely bad However other people believe that the life of old people is much better now than it was in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of water use in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1987 and 2007
- The chart below provides information on the methods of waste disposal in four European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since the computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... aspects of such dresses. For instance, in past, elderly people always wear sarees, blo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
.... Thus, it makes the remembrance of old generations survival of crisis in many circumstance...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ould be migrated to the new generation. Though, wearing ancestral clothes daily would ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, thus, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33548387097 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94941042451 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538709677419 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.9975007877 49.4020404114 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.2941176471 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235562774 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730027279534 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564340676168 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143261123804 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192792738686 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.