People are consuming more and more sugar-based drinks. Why? What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption?
Nowadays, parts of people tend to consume more and more drinks conclude extremely large sugar. This essay will provide suitable reasons and have some keys to prevent this tendency.
Of course, Sugar is an important source of energy that people can absorb to stay healthy, It helps people keep awake and focus on working for a long period. If people must eat a high amount of sugar to work every day, they might have addicted and relied on it which leads them to consume more products that contain lots of sugar, despite knowing the bad impacts of this habit. Moreover, drink companies want to rise their profits so factories have used sugar chemicals in the process of making soft drinks which reduces the cost of buying ingredients. As a result, soft drinks are sold cheaper than a bottle of water at the prices. This interests consumers to spend more money on buying these high sugar drinks instead of purchasing other sorts of drinks. Another reason is that many social media or influencers are convincing and advertising viewers to buy sugar products which creates an upward trend, people begin to buy mass products consist a high amount of sugar inside them.
Fortunately, there are some notable solutions to decline this issue. Firstly, individuals need to be aware that eating lots of sugar will bring bad consequences to their physical health such as obesity, diabetes, and so on. Therefore, taking some hard aerobics or exercises will remove sugar effectively. Moreover, people can change some sweat drinks with healthier drinks like drinking freshwater, smoothies which help people solve the thirsty problem but it is still good for their body. Governments should provide some laws on sugar companies to discourage consumers buy less these products
In conclusion, the overuse of sugary drinks results from sugar addiction. I believe that both individuals and governments to take some effective measures will decline the consumers’ sugar intake
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | huy12345 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | trần thị như minh | 84 | view |
- Nowadays a large amount of advertising aimed at children should be banned because of the negative effects To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 87
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
- Many parents today organise extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 61
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourage consumers buy less these products In conclusion, the overuse of sugary dri...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, of course, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49523765151 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603125 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2465031161 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342614363818 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1198532245 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984689317662 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216313864819 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398463626939 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.