Pros and cons of changing jobs among young people.
The acquisition of gainful employment has significant importance for those seeking to establish a secure and consistent lifestyle. Nevertheless, it is common for individuals in their youth to have a tendency towards frequent employment transitions. The discussion below aims to examine the merits and demerits associated with job transitions among the younger demographic.
On one side of the argument, there are several advantages associated with the act of transitioning between occupations. To begin with, transitioning between occupations facilitates the cultivation of personal attributes among individuals in their early stages of professional development. Indeed, the process of transitioning between occupations might provide young professionals with prospects to delve into novel sectors, acquire a range of encounters, and cultivate fresh proficiencies, eventually expediting their trajectory of professional advancement. Additionally, young individuals are given the chance to augment their earnings. Undoubtedly, the act of transitioning between occupations often results in augmented initial remuneration or improved pay arrangements, particularly when the prospective position entails more duties or pertains to an area characterized by heightened demand.
Conversely, transitioning between occupations also entails some inherent hazards. One primary drawback is the lack of stability. It is evident that the act of often changing jobs might be seen by prospective employers as a manifestation of insufficient dedication, hence potentially impeding the individual's ability to obtain future career prospects or advancements. Another negative aspect that needs discussion is the loss of life balance. The need of adapting to a new job is indisputable, as it entails a heightened demand for more time and effort in order to acclimate oneself to novel tasks, coworkers, and work procedures.
In summary, it is important to acknowledge that like many other topics, the problem under consideration also has dual perspectives. It is readily apparent that transitioning between occupations may provide both advantageous and disadvantageous outcomes. Hence, before to making a decision on employment transition, it is important to thoroughly evaluate the potential benefits and drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ication, hence potentially impeding the individuals ability to obtain future career prospec...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13003095975 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.57719541037 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603715170279 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5425239013 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0860217415145 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255220950032 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371325277506 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047592577276 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286186163487 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.27 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.