In recent year sports stars have become increasingly famous and wealthy. For some this is a benefit, raising the profile of sports, but for others it is a negative influence. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
These days, how easily sports stars attain eminence and even wealth has aroused people’s discussion. For some people, it seems to be an eligible role models with some positive effects towards society; while sports stars are deemed to be related to some other detrimental implications. This paper will elaborate on both sides and my own perspectives will be given as well.
This phenomenon certainly pertains to some demerits of disorientation when beginners undertake their sporty careers. It is possible that apprentices might become fascinated by sports for the wrong reasons and it will stimulate those more interested in high financial and social reward rather than the actual sport. For example, with only some initial success, many athletes are likely to be arrogant and complacent with unrealistic compliment about their talents and stop working towards more achievable goals. Furthermore, immersing too much in sport activities may hinder young people from getting the requisite knowledge that properly inherent with them for the whole life.
There are still, however, some positive sides that also should be taken into consideration. It is noticeable that people are more likely to venerates those sports stars and often mimic their playing styles and even their lifestyles. Renowned athletes are able to become a sport ambassador which may encourage people to participate in sport activities. As a result, it may be an irrefutable motivation not only for enhancing social healthcare but also encouraging and seeking for innate talents. At the same time, many eminent athletes turn out to be a generous philanthropist willing to help the poor and disabled people.
All in all, I adhere to the faith that the sports stars are well-deserved for attaining respectability and even prosperity since their social dedication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-31 | akorn99 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | akorn99 | 73 | view |
- The maps show the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 78
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 84
- The data of retail sectors in online platform in term of 4 different items in Canada in the year of 2005 and 2010 are depicted in these charts It is clear that Electronics and appliance were the top preference throughout dedicated years As can be seen fro
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world Why do you think it is important to do so What will the effect if children are not taught history 56
- Do young people today make good use of their leisure time Or do they spend too much time watching television and playing video games instead of taking part in more productive activities 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, well, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41608391608 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85054256915 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632867132867 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0930749476 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.153846154 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242171058952 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860298855168 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467273339205 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155651969189 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323258656344 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.