In recent years sports stars have become increasingly famous and wealthy. For some this is a benefit, raising the profile of sports, but for others it is a negative influence. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the past, sports stars were not as important as their counterparts such as movie actors or singers in the public eye. However, throughout the years these athlete has become increasingly popular than ever before. Certain people believe this is a good change for sport in general, meanwhile, others remain that this trend would cause negative impacts on society. In this essay, both sides of the argument will be discussed.
First and foremost, professional players, who experienced a surge in fame and income, would feel incentive. In order to meet the expectation of the public as well as the payment from the clubs' owners, those players would focus more on their career, which will offer audiences better performance and higher quality of entertainment. For example, if a new talent, who have an unfortunate life, is founded and funded by sports firms he might be able to continue his career and thrive. As the result, the satisfaction of sports enthusiasts with their favourite players or teams will be improved. Furthermore, famous sports stars could be a good model for kids to look up to. Their action, either inside or outside the games, will have a great impact on the public. Therefore, these professors could call out for change or action with a good purpose such as raising funds for hapless people in Africa.
On the other hand, too much is attention from other people on players that they often suffer from stress-related illnesses. Paparazzi, for instance, have the tendency to infringe on sports professors’ privacy. Therefore, it might cause low performance and destroy one’s career, if there is a great deal of fame on them. In addition, a bad model could mislead the public or cause negative influence, since there is no warranty that they will always behave in the right manner if they have a great number of fans and money.
In conclusion, I believe that both views have a fair share of pros and cons. Although many people think that this trend could have negative effects on professional players and their fame could be detrimental, however, such argument could also be reversed. These stars could feel encouraged and radiate positive energy to the public. In summary, I reckon this phenomenon could be both beneficial and detrimental at the same time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-31 | akorn99 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | akorn99 | 73 | view |
- How should we ensure that the television is a positive influence in the life of children 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of people in the United Kingdom per age group without any qualifications 82
- The bar chart shows the number of volunteers in New Zealand who helped in sports organizations in 2010 The pie chart illustrates the number of volunteers doing different types of jobs for that same period Summarize the information by selecting and reporti 84
- The diagram shows the process for labelling shellfish for the international market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 89
- Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this athlete' or 'these athletes'?
Suggestion: this athlete; these athletes
...blic eye. However, throughout the years these athlete has become increasingly popular than ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i reckon, in addition, in conclusion, in general, in summary, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00787401575 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66048532346 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548556430446 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1512189959 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.421052632 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0526315789 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8421052632 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237808121623 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747083795403 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581314848566 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149855775281 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572591508697 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.