Some people believe that it would be beneficial if employees worked three or four days per week rather than five or six days. Why is this? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience
In recent years, it is believed by some people if the working days in each week of employees are cut down to about four days, it would bring about more benefit for the staff member. There are several reasons for this notion as most people in modern era are leading a hectic lifestyle.
Firstly, it appears that if the work force of firms received more day-off, workers’ mental health would probably be improved. So much pressure from work that it often leads to stress-related illness such as mental breakdown or insomnia. With less day at work, it might enable employees to relieve stress, and thus result in better productivity, which will not only benefit the workers but also the whole organization. Therefore, the more time to recover the better the employee’s performance.
Secondly, given three to four days of working, it could help people attain work and life balance. Recent research shows that over 65% of young workers said that they do not have enough time with their family. In many developed nations, the work force has a tendency to overwork, which is deemed as a commonplace or a cultural of the Japanese, and left little time with family. This might affect the motivation of employees at work, resulting in lower productivity or, even worse, resignation. Therefore, if companies cut back one or two days at work, the life quality of employees is likely to be refined.
In conclusion, people believe companies members would receive many advantages such as work and life balance or stress relief, if they only have to work up to four days a week.
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give your own opinion 89
- The bar chart shows the number of male and female people arrested by type of offence crime Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give opinion 73
- The flow chart shows trampling the negative effect of tourists walking in the countryside for the environment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 65
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88805970149 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60651889386 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585820895522 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9245217895 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.166666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258798786138 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954058060543 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644863102119 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172057523425 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444723474295 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.