Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the present age, financial difficulties are happening in underdeveloped countries owing to their unstable industrial conditions. This means that those are highly in need of substantial support from the global community. However, some people assert that financial aids are impractical in solving poverty; therefore, alternatively, other proper types of help should be provided. Personally, I find this view convincing for the following reasons.

In the first place, there is no denying that financial aid is contemplated as a temporary approach. Although it is widely acknowledged that international pensions can immediately tackle the problem of financial burden, there is no guarantee that poor countries may utilize them correctly in order to address all the problems. For example, African countries have earned billions of dollars donated by multiple developed ones; however, African people still suffer from poverty and lack of basic needs. This incident, coincidently, is the same as giving someone a fish, not a fishing rod. While a fish can provide a meal for the family, a fishing rod might help that person earn a living from it.

Additionally, there appears to be various shreds of evidence demonstrating that challenges to overcome poverty will be alleviated if strategic assistance is held properly. To be more specific, it is highly advisable for foreign supporters to hold careful observations into the living standards of underdeveloped countries. By merely comprehending the hindrances that local people are facing up with, they would propose appropriate measures. Unemployment, for instance, has been one of the primary causes resulting in poverty. Therefore, numerous job opportunities would be given including guided-training so that local residents are able to pursue a career permanently with a monthly decent salary.

All things considered, I firmly approve of the opinion that financial aid is an inefficient approach and should be replaced by other methods of supply. This can be well illustrated by the fact that cash-related donations are superficial and pose no implication in the long run.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-04 honguyenlily 73 view
2023-11-29 Alexanderpopov 56 view
2023-11-02 tracywu 84 view
2023-10-31 thaokim2003 89 view
2023-10-23 Giang Tran 73 view
Essays by user meemeemee :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overcoming'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: overcoming
... evidence demonstrating that challenges to overcome poverty will be alleviated if strategic...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55384615385 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18899884125 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3277676024 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8125 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162287862254 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444863304424 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514155401941 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928611985314 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635887557848 0.056905535591 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.