Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Financial aid is not always beneficial treatment for all the poor countries. Mostly, poor countries need technical help to get sustainable growth path. If developed countries give them technical support to stand against the poverty then it will be the most effective policy to eradicate the poverty. According to my point of view, it is great deal that developed countries supply technical education rather than just a financial help.
Poor countries are poor because they do not utilize their natural and human resources properly. To extract the natural resources of any country, she needs research and techniques, which can be provided the developed countries. As developed countries are developed due to their research and technology, but most of countries do not want to share their technological methods because they achieve it after prolonged hard work.
Poverty is vicious circle and it cannot be vanished without big push. If we analysis what is the meaning of big push, Big push means huge investment from developed countries in capital structure which will generate employment and give permanent solution of poverty. On other hand, developed countries can also start the different projects to extract the natural resources of underdeveloped countries, it will also generate employment and resources.
To sum up the arguments, it would recommend that developed countries should help the less developed countries in the reference of research education and technology. Whereas financial help in context of food and other things would not create the fruitful results. It is just a temporary solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Fossil fuels e g coals oil and gas are the main source of energy for most countries However alternative sources of energy e g wind and solar have been encouraged for use by some countries To what extent is this a positive or negative development 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit Discuss both these views and give 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...al help to get sustainable growth path. If developed countries give them technical...
^^
Line 2, column 306, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the countries') or simply say ''most countries''.
Suggestion: most of the countries; most countries
...e to their research and technology, but most of countries do not want to share their technologica...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, whereas, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42231075697 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83668136429 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557768924303 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9019244937 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.692307692 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379466384438 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128478112738 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795918321594 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227337782152 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058745860107 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.