Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet, and they can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technological advances have revolutionized many aspects of life, sparking debates about whether physical schools should be made redundant. While acknowledging the reasons for this thinking, I would argue that the Internet cannot marginalize traditional education institutions.
Granted, proponents of brick-and-mortar schools may argue that the Internet could empower students to assess a plethora of subject-related information and lessons online without charges. YouTube, one of the biggest online-sharing platforms, for example, has facilitated many students' learning journey, serving as a testament to how powerful technology can be in our lives. However, herein lies the rub: learners could easily be overwhelmed by an enormous amount of information and countless learning materials. This, as a consequence, leads to students not knowing where to start and what to do next with their studies, stifling their ability to effectively study and hence an ineffective learning method.
The argument in favor of conventional schools is further strengthened by its role as a facilitator for developing interpersonal skills. For example, collaborating closely in a group to do a presentation can foster a sense of cooperation for those involved. The same can be said about other skills such as conflict resolution, teamwork, time management, among others. Moreover, schools provide students with a structured curriculum, potentially helping develop overall skills, knowledge and avoid being confused by an unorganized long list of information and materials floating around the Internet. These two aforementioned arguments lead me to believe that schools cannot be marginalized and still have an indispensable role to play in our modern world.
In conclusion, while there are justifications for advocating a future world without physical schools, I would argue that it is still crucial to keep these schools, given the potential confusion of the Internet, schools’ role in fostering soft skills, and its nature to offer a structured, organized school curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | wholemilk | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | hellovenuss6899 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | ThanhHacker0306 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | ThanhHacker0306 | 78 | view |
- Some people say that young people can learn useful skills by playing electronic and computer games Others say that young people who play electronic and computer games are wasting their time Discuss both views and give your own opinions 89
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is a natural process for animal species such as dinosaurs and dodos to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 293, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to journey'
Suggestion: to journey
... has facilitated many students learning journey, serving as a testament to how powerful...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... learners could easily be overwhelmed by an enormous amount of information and co...
^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e students with a structured curriculum, potentially helping develop overall skil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81518151815 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34016553027 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646864686469 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1121768326 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.833333333 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120279002109 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438528096191 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0184866322987 0.0667982634062 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683603471544 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269747757455 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.