Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
Speaking a common language is seemed to be the future development of humanity all over the world. Although this may have disadvantages, in my opinion, I believe that it is an overall positive trend.
There are considerable benefits to speaking a dialect. Firstly, this development may remove language barriers among people in the globe to communicate more conveniently. For example, people could travel around the world and explore new destinations freely without using dictionaries or helps of translators anymore. Secondly, people could easily research and acquire knowledge when everything would be written and published in a same language. For instance, university students could look for and read books of authors in the whole world and only focus on books’ contents other than making attempt to understand their languages. Finally, speaking a common language may open a door to more international jobs for workers. Indeed, employees could seek jobs in different countries without concern about spending time and money learning new languages, which may be unaffordable.
On the other hand, using a universal language will have potential disadvantages. One reason for this view is that language is a part of national cultural identity, so that if humans only use one language, it would spoil the diversity of languages. Ancient stories and historical documents would be lost because no one would be able to read or understand them and people may feel a sense of loss. Besides, language is a mean material of music which plays a vital role in human life. Therefore, it would be boring to listen to a Vietnamese song which is similar to Korean song.
In conclusion, although a universal language may have some notable drawbacks, I firmly hold the view that the merits are more significant.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25605536332 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92911837215 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595155709343 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9440305661 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.266666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118328740033 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454819053199 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486718626195 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079825077874 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679307838681 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.