Accomodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities. Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas . Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ?
Encouraging businesses to move to rural areas to solve accomodation and transport problems in many large cities is a developing policy. Although there are some drawbacks of this policy, I believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
There are considerable benefits to relocating businesses from urban to rural areas. Firstly, this policy might handle the problem of housing shortage. Since it allow cities’ authorities to have more land to build residential areas. As a result, citizens could afford houses in the metropolis instead of living in narrow rental apartments. Secondly, traffic problem would be significantly reduced through this develoment. Because moving firms to remote areas could make the people working for these companies move out of large cities. This would make a great contribution to the reduction of the number of workers’ vehicles travelling on the streets, especially during rush hour. Finally, appearing more factories in rural areas could also create more job opportunities and boost the economic development in these places.
On the other hand, there are some potential disadvantages to changing location of companies. The first one is that these companies will have to spend a large amount of expense rebuilding their facilities. It also leads to the restriction in their industrial activities because it could take them months or years to restart their business. Another drawback is that the relocations will make companies move far away from their customers, resulting in increasing their product price due to higher shipping cost, thereby weakening their competitiveness in the market.
In conclusion, although the moving businesses to rural areas may bring some notable drawbacks, this policy could result in enormous benefits to our society. So that I certainly hold the view that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Encouraging businesses to move to rural areas to solve accomoda...
^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the problem of housing shortage. Since it allow cities' authorities to hav...
^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reas. As a result, citizens could afford houses in the metropolis instead of livi...
^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... working for these companies move out of large cities. This would make a great co...
^^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... This would make a great contribution to the reduction of the number of workers&a...
^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e drawbacks, this policy could result in enormous benefits to our society. So tha...
^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t in enormous benefits to our society. So that I certainly hold the view that the adva...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59233449477 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01633507166 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595818815331 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3327841899 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297427965936 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869902130819 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118906081252 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202382710355 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142921533637 0.056905535591 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.