Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case?
Do you think this is a positive or a negative
development?
The paragraph describes few children have been consuming most of the time with their smartphones. This phenomena has hit the globe few years ago, when technology has evolved its nature and begun to provide most of the information and entertainment in a portable device. As per my view, this is an adverse development.
The evolution of technology has a great effect on people nowadays. In olden days an individual used to collect data from visiting libraries and meeting people, the mankind need to meet for having a verbal communication. However, the usage of has been started and no two person need not be intact far having a personal communication. In a recent survey conducted by “BBC” ninty-two percent of world population have been using smartphones.
There are numerous adverse impacts of using a vast amount of time smartphones. Today's generation have addicted to technology in every aspect like shopping, communication, games. There need to be physical activity for a human body, by spending more turn on cellphones the body becomes lazy cause few health diseases. It could be solved by imposing quite rules like minimizing the usage of smart devices and making them spend point with their mates. In a recent survey conducted by “twitter” it revealed that children who spent more time on smartphones are now having social issues and having therapy sessions.
In conclusion, As an individual my opinion is that evolution of technology has benefited a number of fields however it also has drawbacks that effect the children who are the future of this world. Invest a minimum amount of time on devices and making the use of it for personal and professional benefits is the best solution I found for this case.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-21 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | nle2006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 70 | view |
- Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects other people think in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both the views and give your opinion 56
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 56
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 61
- governments should spend money on railways rather than roads to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ost of the time with their smartphones. This phenomena has hit the globe few years a...
^^^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
... with their smartphones. This phenomena has hit the globe few years ago, when techn...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05944055944 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87435768891 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56993006993 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2526437001 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.357142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128812044135 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419610725549 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330756493141 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812174254596 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419945778632 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.