Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, many countries aspire to become leading nations in the world of sports. While some prioritize investing in specialized facilities for high-level athletes, others prioritize providing sport and exercise facilities for general public use. While both options are important, I believe that having specialized facilities for elite athletes is a positive development.
On the one hand, investing in public sporting facilities is essential. When provided with adequate facilities and equipment, citizens can improve their health and well-being by engaging in regular physical activity. This can lead to long-term benefits for the country, including a healthier population, lower healthcare costs, and increased levels of happiness. For example, studies have shown that regular physical activity can reduce the risk of chronic diseases such as heart disease and diabetes.
On the other hand, investing in specialized facilities for training talented athletes is equally important. These facilities provide top-level athletes with the resources and support they need to reach their full potential and compete at a world-class level. This can lead to honors and glory for the country, as well as economic benefits. For instance, Kenya, one of the poorest countries in the world, has become one of the countries with the most athletics Olympic medals. They have employed the athletes' popularity and success to gradually boost the nation's economy.
In conclusion, while investing in public sporting facilities is important, specialized training facilities are crucial for nations that aspire to create top-level athletes. By providing these facilities, countries can maximize the potential of their athletes and achieve honors and success in sports, while also reaping economic benefits. Therefore, I believe that having specialized facilities for elite athletes is a positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
- The fashion industry is harmful to society and the environment Do you agree or disagree 67
- The education of young people is the main priority in countries around the world Some people believe that educating adults who cannot read or write is important and governments should spend more money on this To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 61
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid 56
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...iding sport and exercise facilities for general public use. While both options are important, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'athletes'' or 'athlete's'?
Suggestion: athletes'; athlete's
... Olympic medals. They have employed the athletes popularity and success to gradually boo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...rity and success to gradually boost the nations economy. In conclusion, while invest...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84837545126 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88496220886 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516245487365 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4872624612 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33879765079 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123520276774 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720214997315 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238864978786 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822925592655 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.