In some countries, many people suffer from health problems due to eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
Do you agree or disagree?
In many countries, people’s healths are at risk because of eating too much junk food; therefore, it is necessary that governments should impose a higher tax on this kind of food. I firmly agree with this idea because levying a higher rate of tax on fast food will limit the customers’ consumption and money from taxing can also be invested in nutrition’s education.
Firstly, levying a more expansive tariff on fast-food industry will reduce in overall customers’ consumptions. This is because the more expansive the tax is, the higher product cost is, and leading to less people be able to pay for this meal. Instead of buying fast food, people will be much cheaper but containing higher nutritrional value foods, like fishes, vegetables and meats. For example, Vietnam government has already imposed high taxes on fast-food industry to decrease the consuming of this type of food. Therefore, from 2010 to 2024, less children and adults eat junk food than ever, and the country’s healths are improving in a positive trend.
Secondly, money from junk-food’s taxes can use in a more meaningful way, such as raising awareness about nutrition. Most people eat junk food because of its convenience and addicted favour; so they care less about its nutritional values and long-term health’s consequences. By this way, more and more people suffer health’s risks later in life, such as obesity and heart attack. However, this triger issue can be solve if goverments use money from imposing fast-food industry’s taxes to educate people about nutrition and risk when they consume fast food regurlary. For instance, many schools in Vietnam have already teach children about what kind of food they should eat and what shouldn’t. Therefore, many children have given up take-away foods, such as pizza, hamburger and soft drinks, by choosing healthier options instead.
In conclusion, I totally agree that junk food should be levied a higher tax to reduce the amount of consumption and raise people’s awareness about nutritional values to improve everyone’s health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-28 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-28 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | cupinsiuway | 78 | view |
- Details of politicians private lives should not be published in newspapers To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- In some countries many people suffer from health problems due to eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- Parents of obese children should be punished for making them fat Do you Agree or disagree 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... higher product cost is, and leading to less people be able to pay for this meal. In...
^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun children is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... of food. Therefore, from 2010 to 2024, less children and adults eat junk food than ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 618, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'taught'.
Suggestion: taught
...e, many schools in Vietnam have already teach children about what kind of food they s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28915662651 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78156738967 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539156626506 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7177195818 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430706560444 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165997138782 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103557961251 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294415467007 0.151304729494 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100438802591 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.