In many cities, planners tend to arrange shops, schools, offices, and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a big controversy surrounding structures who have a propensity to arrange shops, schools, offices, and homes in isolated and independent areas. Despite the fact the downsides of this problem could be pronounced, I strongly believe that they are still outweighed by the perks.
On the one hand, there are some merits which should be taken into consideration. Arranging every kind in every specific area seems to be more straightforward to manage. This means that the governments can apply specific laws and regulations for the exact area. Citizens do not struggle to understand the legal system because they only know which laws will be applied in their area. In addition, the government can impose stringent penalties towards any areas which people do not respect for the legal system.
On the other hand, this action could be fraught with any pitfall. Firstly, citizens can have difficulties finding any specific shops if they need to have necessary things for themselves. It can be quite far to move to another area to buy something. It is not likely to separate shops, schools, offices and homes in specific areas. Secondly, some people are ready to pay a huge amount of money to connect all utilities in their living areas because of its comfort. Therefore, there is no reason to separate them in any specific areas. Taking Vinhomes as an example, planners have boosted the apartments' prices to bring all necessary things which residents want to have there.
In conclusion, it seems to me that this will bring numerous adverse impacts if planners continue to arrange all kinds in specific areas. I strongly believe that the disadvantages significantly outweigh the advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... strongly believe that the disadvantages significantly outweigh the advantages. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11913357401 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77998498964 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56678700361 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3853705098 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.625 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210372789632 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710867112343 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432936481678 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124492656467 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291310963725 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.