In some countries, parents expect children to spend a long time studying in and after school and have less free time.
Do you think it has positive or negative effects on children and the society that they live in?
It is said that children are expected to spend less time enjoying leisure activities to study more after school. From my viewpoint, this is a negative development when it affects seriously students’ productivity and creativity.
Tiredness is a real threat to youngsters as it reduces their energy to maintain their performance. Take a normal high school student in Vietnam as an example, he usually spends 6-8 hours a day learning compulsory subjects at school and a few hours after that attending extra classes. As a result, he loses all the energy when he gets home, being unable to finish homework or prepare for the next day. In other words, he does not make any progress as he does not do any revision and soon he will be left behind. While other students, who spend less time cramming for all subjects, prefer to review old lessons and have a thorough knowledge, becoming better by day.
Nevertheless, studying too much also causes harm to children's creativity. Most of the time is used for brainstorming so the brain has less time to refresh and is always at work. And if the brain is unable to recover its energy, it will be unlikely to function properly, especially to think creatively. However, innovation is the prime key to the development of countries as it has altered the world from the stone age to the developed world now. Hence, the reduction of creativity not only impacts young generations but also the future world.
In conclusion, Studying extra hours may bring more negative consequences than its merits. Therefore, schools and educational ministry should stride a balance between learning and relaxing time to guarantee the best development of our world.
- IN THE FUTURE ALL CARS BUSES AND TRUCKS WILL BE DRIVERLESS THE ONLY PEOPLE TRAVELLING INSIDE THESE VEHICLES WILL BE PASSENGERS DO YOU THINK THE ADVANTAGES OF DRIVERLESS VEHICLES OUTWEIGHT THE DISADVANTAGES 84
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The charts show information concerning speed camera use together with statistics on road accidents for the city of Melbourne Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- In the modern world people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems what are the problems what can be done to solve the problems 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79773525718 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624113475177 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3797139391 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.714285714 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225807738193 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730192690928 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903478430695 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144125313296 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709473864699 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.