Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is thought by some companies that stunning in look is obligation for employees. However, treasuring skillful workers is more important than appearance. According to this notion. dress smartly is beneficial to gain customer satisfaction in some industries such as retail and hospitality. However, I think the firm should appreciate a good performance amongst staff members in order to level up innovation.
Some companies such as retail and hospitality need to improve their employee’s appearance in order to gain good value in customer experience. Good looking and dress smartly are the key point to satisfy clients, these considerable values might not a terrible bother for the customer while shopping or leisuring. For instance, majority hotels in Indonesia, have high standard for their workers such as having proporsional body image, 170 centimetres for height and about 60 killograms for weight, dress formally in fullday working hours.
In fact, organisation’s positive development is created by skillful workers and in line with it, rewarding the staff members is top-priority for company. By this culture and environment in industry, the stakeholders are becoming more innovative and having space to implement new idea onto the firm. At the moment, Google has paid more than thousand of dollars for well-qualified employees. As the result, plenty of innovation has been created by staff members such as Android, Artificial Intelligence (AI) machine system, Google Clasrroom or numbers of apps in playstore. Hence, these positive impacts, however, might not emerge if the company does not value the quality of work above outward aspect.
In conclusion, I believe rewarding good performance amongst employees has positive impact on company’s achievement in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-02 | tranvuongphuongmy | 61 | view |
- The car disastrous 20th century invention that has made the world s cities more dangerous and polluted as well as being responsible for the death of millions of people in car accidents 80
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities Others however think that horizontal cities are better for living and working Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think enviromental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally Discuss both sides and give your reason 73
- There seems to be an increasing trend towards assesing students through exams rather than continual assesment What are the advantages and disadvantages of exams as a form of assesment 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Dress
...n appearance. According to this notion. dress smartly is beneficial to gain customer ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...t the moment, Google has paid more than thousand of dollars for well-qualified employees...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, so, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58455882353 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05438158457 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606617647059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1981983743 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16874716221 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535882819755 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562650239892 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942516542778 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034389171265 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.