Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include

Essay topics:

Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day. Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Whether the children should be allowed to use the phones in school or not, is an ongoing debatable issue in many societies. Some citizens oppose the idea of allowing childrens using mobiles, while many are the proponent of giving phones access to people regradless of age even to children. I would like to take strong side towards the former notion.

To begin with the opinion of banning adolescents from using phones, there are certain reasons that the proponents of this idea consider. Firstly, mobile phone is alucrative technology for every age groups. This is even more true for juveniles. When they get this in their hand, there is high possibility that they can misuse it. It may harm their concetration to study. Moreover, they can be exposed to many dangerous incidents due to imprudent use of phones. It was observed in various school surveys that youngters are addicted to pornograpgy via the smartphones. This in turn has the unhealthy consequences in their life and society.

On the other hand, many people explain that, children should use mobile in schools to learn the modern communication system witg their peers and the family. It can provide some relief to the parents as they can get instant information about the situation of their kids. This can prevent them from being lost which happened many times in the past. Additionally, some believers of this idea feel that, adolescents should learn how to use phones wisely that can help in their study and in real life. If they are deprived of phones, they will not get this experience which may make them feel lagged behind in the long run.

Summing up, we are in the era of fast growing technology. Technology has both pros and cons, but it completely depends on the user. Mobile phone is definitely an useful tool for every age group, but reckless use of this technology may make someone vulnerable to unexpected incident that may destroy the whole life. Children should concentrate on study during school day. In our experience, we did not feel any necessity of using phones when we were in schools. Their might be other solutions to the problems which are generally concerned by the proponent of allowing mobiles to the youngsters. Mobile should be resitricted to use until a certain age group.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-12 RTroMT 78 view
2023-08-03 ThoiPhong 84 view
2023-07-09 tieuquynh 84 view
2023-06-19 quang0612@1 61 view
2023-05-17 chesse 61 view
Essays by user Md Mazedul Islam :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...on the user. Mobile phone is definitely an useful tool for every age group, but re...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57725432158 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535064935065 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6915642689 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1739130435 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7391304348 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60869565217 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367123533912 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982847236196 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816367951455 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231362603279 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507318140902 0.056905535591 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...on the user. Mobile phone is definitely an useful tool for every age group, but re...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57725432158 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535064935065 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6915642689 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1739130435 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7391304348 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60869565217 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367123533912 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982847236196 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816367951455 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231362603279 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507318140902 0.056905535591 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.