Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages higher level of violence in that society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
There has always been a controversy as regards whether or not a police officer brings weapons leading to an increasing of social violence. While people are in favor of this statement, I partly agree with this idea for the following reasons.
On the one hand, it would be beneficial for policemen to carry guns. First of all, it is necessary for them to deter mass demonstration and social anarchy. For instance, in some countries such as Cambodia, Pakistan, police officers are armed guns to put down demonstration. Secondly, guns are effective deterrent to against criminal behaviors and make a feeling of safeness for citizens. In Vietnam, government enacts a law for policemen bring and fire in some dangerous situations that pose a serious threat to their lives. Therefore, people may feel safe when they see armed police, especially in some heightened risks.
On the other hand, it would have negative impacts on social violence if policemen are armed with guns. The first reason worth mentioning is that it would be likely to lead a misunderstanding of citizens in terms of using guns freely, sometimes; it would be in danger of people’s lives. In American, for instance, Stephen Craig Paddock who fired into a crowd of 22,000 concert attendants in music festival on Las Vegas strip. Secondly, in some special situations, police officers shot innocent people. A striking illustration is that police in California shot a man called Sacramento with 20 rounds because they thought he held a gun, but actually it was a cellphone. Unquestionably, armed polices are able to spark civil unrest and a wave of protests from citizens against policemen.
In conclusion, while I agree that policemen should be armed with guns, I also believe that it will create some violence in society for the aforementioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-30 | Patricias | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-29 | maytrang | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-20 | sarkariasaab8@email .com | 67 | view |
| 2018-03-20 | linhoang997 | 56 | view |
| 2017-06-16 | MinhNgoc 299 | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person’s nature. Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Earlier technological development brought more changes to the life of ordinary people than recent technological development do To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Studies suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or c 73
- Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people. Some people say that younger people could be leaders. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think that the development of technology has made our life more complex and the solution is to live a simpler life without that technology Do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...as always been a controversy as regards whether or not a police officer brings weapons leading...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, especially in some heightened risks. On the other hand, it would have negativ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as regards, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11705685619 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92350930119 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605351170569 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0676075135 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177883770064 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609505845167 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061886091213 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128696737609 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451944489279 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.