Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals companies and society Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life. Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals, companies, and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In the fast-paced world, some people take a view that the vast majority of graduate students have a tendency to change their career whereas others have a constrast idea that doing a same job experiences a substantial amount of definite benefits for human, corporations and whole society. In this essay, I am going to take into account on both sides.
On the one hand, it brings the plethora of pros to do a same job. Firstly, individuals will have a stable profession to make ends meet for a long-term process. They run a higher risk of gaining effortless promotion because of the effective productivity and the capacity of thinking out of the box to uplift their company's progress and triumph. Secondly, working permanently for a business promotes each person to make access to the finesse and expert in the sphere they make up their mind to choose more quickly. The well- qualified capacity is a gold opportunity in order to recruit employees with highly-attractive treatment regarding to income, physical facilities, amenities,...
Thirdly, people who are working for a long time are likely to be predecessors and consultants for the post-generation,which is the indirect leverage for the impetus of business as well as consolidation for the sustainable development of the day-to-day civilization.
On the other hand, there is flew of limited cons of switching constantly a job. Firstly, Individuals are taken aback due mainly to the complete strange and jeopardies because they have never been learnt previously. For example, turning a job on an educational sphere into medical domain particularly doctors which experiences substantial arduousness and poses perilous threats. They are coerced to be accustomed to wield the scalpel being the mainstay to practice the surgical operations. Secondly, allocating more time to change the amount of job endlessly is the roof reason to achieve no long-standing position in both company and the whole general fields.
To sum up, each sides has their own pros and cons because of aforementioned reasons. As far as I am concerned, it is advisable to stabilize their job in lieu of changing it, which is beneficial for both individuals and society scope.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-19 hien3112 67 view
2022-09-09 Charles Le 61 view
2022-08-08 Master Panda 73 view
2022-05-18 cynnie.chan 73 view
2022-03-01 Trần Ánh Vy 84 view
Essays by user ngannguyen2408 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 678, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...o income, physical facilities, amenities,... Thirdly, people who are working for...
^^
Line 2, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...come, physical facilities, amenities,... Thirdly, people who are working for a lo...
^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
... and consultants for the post-generation,which is the indirect leverage for the impetu...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'flown'.
Suggestion: flown
...ilization. On the other hand, there is flew of limited cons of switching constantly...
^^^^
Line 4, column 401, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to wielding'.
Suggestion: accustomed to wielding
...erilous threats. They are coerced to be accustomed to wield the scalpel being the mainstay to pract...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, whereas, for example, in particular, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18258426966 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16754681045 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575842696629 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.124700895 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318142557532 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927136514389 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846980558134 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163174064761 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256037303852 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.