Some people believe that using taxpayer funds to look for life on their planets is important. Others, however, think that it’s a waste of public money because there are much more important issues requiring funding on our own planet.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It’s been believed that taxpayer funds should be used to search for life on other planets. On the contrary, another opinion disagrees, and assumes that’s it is just a waste of public money, as there are already other essential problems on earth requiring these funds. This essay will discuss this controversial topic from the two points of view.
Taxpayer funds are not something that’s grounded, it’s changeable. Thus, we cannot depend on them as a regular income to be used for making developments on our planet. It comes from people’s money for receiving some services. For instance, people pay money to governments to get some benefits for their livings. Hence, these funds should be utilized in a vital issue like, discovering if there is any other planet that will be habitable. Moreover, it’s something that needs to be done sooner or later, when life on earth comes to an end. Why shall we neglect, or postpone it when we already have a good source of income to be kept and used for?
On the other hand, “why shall we go and look for a sort of “may-be” solution, an uncertain one, when we can fix what we already have?” this is how other individuals think of it. Instead of wasting such a huge income on an uncertain matter, we would rather give our best shot to save our own planet. Eventually, this is all we have got so far so, let’s make the best of it. For example, these savings could be spent on environmental projects that would keep our world a long lasting survival place. In addition, all public money should be helping in solving all of our difficulties, by being dedicated to researches, studies, experiments, and ……etc.
To sum up, both of the two views support their theories with convincing evidences. For my opinion, I consider the importance of managing our all resources, money, and whatever we can provide to keep our planet valid and survival all the way long for us and for the upcoming generations.
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 67
- In your opinion should young people choose their profession or should their parents choose for them 95
- It is common practice for some students to take a gap year after graduating high school to work and or travel What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of this 56
- The diagram Schoenberg biofuel called Ethan is produced 61
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cuss both views and give your opinion. It’s been believed that taxpayer funds s...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial topic from the two points of view. Taxpayer funds are not something that’s ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rce of income to be kept and used for? On the other hand, “why shall we go and ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ches, studies, experiments, and ……etc. To sum up, both of the two views support...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, sort of, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79479768786 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64139872095 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563583815029 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8181215683 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305532231516 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934614622827 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712625352143 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14968233963 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853658869538 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.