Some people believe that using taxpayer funds to look for life on their planets is important. Others, however, think that it’s a waste of public money because there are much more important issues requiring funding on our own planet.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Some people has been arguing about using of taxpayer as a way of funding to search for life on other planets. This essay will discuss the useless of this though some objections.
People who believe that it is important to search for life on other planets assumes that it will help our planet to develop. Communication with another planet is going to develop Earth's economy. Moreover, new elements are going to be discovered leading to a jump in chemistry, physics and all sciences. A lot of benefits will be gained. Aliens that will be found can help us in lots of things. They say that all the planets were not created for no one. For that reason, there must be a life in another planet. There are lots of advantages that can't be ignored.
On the other hand, people who refuses the previous opinion doubts in the presence of life on another planets. In addition, if there is another life, who is sure that if they knew about us they aren't going to invade us? It is better to keep in peace and instead of nonsense that will not benefit anyone, we should use public money in more important issues. Earth is in its worst situations as there are wars, natural disasters and issues that threatens Earth as global warming. Using community money for solving the previous issues is more important. Firstly, we should improve our planet and solve issues requiring funding then we can search for another life in other planets after that.
To sum up, wasting money on searching for life on other planets is nonsense. I slightly agree with the benefits that will happen but harms are more than that. We should organize our goals and what is worth society's money before anything.
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- In your opinion should young people choose their profession or should their parents choose for them 61
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factor contributes to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 61
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think intelligence can be measured in other ways What s your opinion 56
- Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or Dvds Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...anet. There are lots of advantages that cant be ignored. On the other hand, peopl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...is sure that if they knew about us they arent going to invade us? It is better to kee...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66554054054 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29671842866 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2623798527 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.6842105263 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5789473684 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340264835009 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100299616207 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980400278873 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204891922599 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370008089382 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.0946893788 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.