Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.
Discuss this viewpoint and give your own opinion.
Eating not meat has been in vouge these days. Many people prefer not to consume animals. These people believe that it can give many advantages to the body as well as generating better world to live in.
Consuming meatless meals are good for health. Since beef and fish contained a plethora of saturated fat and colestrol, they can harm human body in a long term. On the other hand, a plant-based diet is the best ways to replace meet in order to give enough nutritiens to the body and gains fewer calories, less fat, weight less and even lower the risk of some diseases. However, in several condition which human body still require meat to consume, becoming a flexitarian can be an option . take sheep as an example, this animal contains more colestrol than the body needed, therefore, for some people who experienced certain diseases related to colestrol are dissallowed to eat sheeps. As a result, for those who do not consume beef or fish they have good metabolism and healthier body. Thus, I believe that eat no fish or meat can generate a healthy life.
Furthermore, reducing meat intake can effectively rebuild the unbalanced food chain. Because of the rapid increase in fast food industry, there are more chickens slayed everyday leaving imbalance in the food chain; hence, eating no chickens or other meat will fix this problem. In several areas in Indonesia, there are groups of people campaigning about not consuming chickens because there is a significant increase in the population of worms disturbing the harvest process. This is only one tiny example about what is going to happen if we keep still consuming animals. While numbers of animals are sacrifying everyday to fulfill people needs, the hidden disaster might be happened in the future bringing a serious threat to humankind. The more animals we eat, the worse the food chain is.
To sum up, I personally think that consuming no beef, chicken or fish is necessary for generating healthy life and healthy world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 381, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun condition seems to be countable; consider using: 'several conditions'.
Suggestion: several conditions
... the risk of some diseases. However, in several condition which human body still require meat to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 486, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... becoming a flexitarian can be an option . take sheep as an example, this animal ...
^^
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Take
...coming a flexitarian can be an option . take sheep as an example, this animal conta...
^^^^
Line 2, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lexitarian can be an option . take sheep as an example, this animal contains more...
^^
Line 2, column 840, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve that eat no fish or meat can generate a healthy life. Furthermore, reducing ...
^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...While numbers of animals are sacrifying everyday to fulfill people needs, the hidden dis...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5466061392 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8265355913 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1764705882 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227135514015 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706197721051 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429442901915 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130959778529 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340489377773 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.