Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Enhancing public health is a debatable issue around the globe. While some people consider an increase in the number of sports facilities to be the most effective way of dealing with this problem, I think other alternatives should also be taken into account as long as public health is concerned.
There are some valid reasons why the ubiquity of sports complexes is of great help in improving the health of public. Firstly, if there are enough well-equipped sports centers in a particular area, residents are highly likely to be motivated to use them regularly. This consistent physical activity is essential for maintaining a healthy weight, reducing the risk of chronic diseases, such as heart disease or diabetes. Not only can people become physically healthy, but they can also gain mental health benefits by attending gymnasiums or recreation centers. The more people do sports constantly, the less stress they carry, which can lead to improved mental well-being in the long run.
That said, however useful this practice is, it does not mean rising the number of sports center locations is the best way. There are other measures that can benefit more than this, one of which is conducting health education and awareness programs. With the help of such events, governments can provide education on healthy lifestyle, and advantages of physical activity. Another viable method is to improve the healthcare services, and to make them available for all classes of people. When everyone has access to quality services of health centers, the number of diseased people might be reduced eventually. Thus, these solutions are more helpful in terms of health improvements.
To conclude, although availability of more sports settings can improve public health to some extent, it is not the best way at all. In my opinion, two of other alternatives, including increased public consciousness and easily accessible healthcare services, can lead the society to healthier lifestyle.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-25 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
2023-07-14 | Ediyorbek521 | 89 | view |
2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
2022-11-24 | Alili | 67 | view |
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With increased use of computers the internet and smartphones more and more people are starting to work from home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 84
- Online education has gained huge popularity in recent years Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of online education 89
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 73
- the graph below shows predictions about the numbers of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, well, while, i think, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29523809524 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77928122579 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0113433362 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326700538068 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107804647637 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792108813183 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218764309114 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615330447594 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.