Some people say that parents have the most important role in a child’s development. However, others argue that other things like television or friends have the most significant influence. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have divergent opinions as whether parents or other things such as television and friends should play an integral role in a child’s life. While some argue that friends have an indispensable impact on a child’ life, I strongly argue that parents are the most prominent factor which can impact immensely on their child.
A growing research suggests that if parents do not direct the right route for their child in the childhood, they can be misled by other outside factors. This means that parents play an important role in leading and encouraging the right route for their offspring, especially in their childhood. This helps a child not only to get out of crimes in society but also to be likely to succeed in the future. Moreover, every child is a mirror which reflects the qualifications of their parents. Therefore, individuals who act as a parental role need to behave and treat people well so that their child can follow as a lesson in life.
On the other hand, there are numerous reasons why other things such as friends or televisions have the most significant influence on a child. The most apparent reason is that should they get connected with bad friends, they can be attracted by social maladies, which they can not know. This is synonymous that a child should get closer with good friends to form comprehensive characteristics for themselves. For example, in most cases, people who are the same qualifications are likely to get close faster than those of the opposite trend. If a child chooses their friends wrongly, they could be stimulated to act like murderers to serve their friends’ purposes.
In conclusion, while some people believe that other things like friends or television can have the most important impact on a child, I personally argue that there are more compelling reasons which parents can play an integral role in their child.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93987341772 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6900502548 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477848101266 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0283754939 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.076923077 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354749655903 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146951881126 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131981622715 0.0667982634062 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273126683328 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100936332827 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.