Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a

Essay topics:

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The young generation in Taiwan now faces the question about what subject should they learn in the university. This is always the most discussed issue when talking about future recruitment need. I am going to discuss the pros and cons of whether university students should study more subjects, and give my point of view. For me, I think students should follow their interests to decide what they want to learn, without setting the limitation.

Only if students truly desire to learn, they can really and vastly absorb. At the same time, they are actively planning their learning schedule for requiring more knowledge. In addition, the more skills they learned, the less stress they will feel when facing challenges in the future because they are capable to solve various kinds of problems.

Some traditional parents may claim that studying a subject that meets the future market needs can guarantee better lifestyles and earn more money. Due to some reliable predictions about future industries, children should put much more effort into science and technology in the university. Then after graduating, they have much bigger opportunities to attend the big company and have a promising future.

I think students should study whatever they like at the university. Since the world becomes more creative and innovative, there is an increasing number of startups. Therefore, multiple skills are warranted. Otherwise, only if you are interested in it, you are willing to spend most of your time into it, without complaint and faintness.

To sum up, there are a few good outcomes as studying the useful subjects in the future; however, the liberation of learning subjects is perceived as a long-term effective formula.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-23 zixuan 89 view
2020-01-16 shihan99 67 view
2020-01-10 thyarthy 84 view
2020-01-06 Techna 67 view
2019-12-14 lexuanthai93 73 view
Essays by user Megan Chen :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, i think, in addition, talking about, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23104693141 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63574499215 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606498194946 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7946856066 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309515331802 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100786160161 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895977227165 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160110699866 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382159245427 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.