Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, together with social development, tertiary education is also regarded considerably. Some people are of the opinion that students can make decisions about their favorite subjects at university. However, some others are opposed to this idea, claiming that it’s better for students to be forced to learn some certain key subject areas. From my perspective, both points of view are of great significance in equal measure, but I believe that choosing preferred fields brings more benefits for students.
There are several reasons why many people believe that students should only learn subjects related to science, technology, or medical courses. First of all, they consider that these areas are more likely to be beneficial than others. It is undeniable that these subjects bring a huge amount of practical advantages related to our life. Furthermore, students can get career prospects when learning these useful subjects. Social development today leads to the lack of specialized staff. As a result, students have a lot of opportunities to apply for suitable jobs.
In spite of the above arguments, I support the view that learning whatever they like at university is more valuable. The first reason is that each subject has various values. We can’t assert that this area is more important than that one. Instead of that, all subjects that students are learned impact divergently to all aspects of our society. For instance, music or arts have no small influences on our spiritual life such as helping us release stress in life or express our love to others. Moreover, students are always excited about their studies when being decided what they learn. Following a passion is one of the best ways to promote quality learning. Thanks to it, students can improve as well as enhance their ability related to their areas.
For the reasons mentioned above, although it might be sensible for all universities to require the students to learn useful subjects, I personally prefer the current system in which people have the right to study whatever they like.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 67 | view |
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 67
- the pie chart compares water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 73
- the pie chart compares water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to impact'
Suggestion: to impact
... all subjects that students are learned impact divergently to all aspects of our socie...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19161676647 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62793080098 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604790419162 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5011931211 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2631578947 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5789473684 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326780602181 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085672363897 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742864586511 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203225905925 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390896388233 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.