Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this
money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
It is argued that the money of the government should be better spent on other fields rather than the arts. From my perspective, I oppose this notion as artistic forms can contribute to the whole economy, either directly or indirectly. Thus, I shall convey my arguments to concrete my opinion in this essay.
The first reason why authorities should remain investing in the arts is the direct benefit of it. Plenty of forms of art can instantly gain profit, and an instance of them is cinema. The silver screen industry is capable of attracting a great mass of audience; thus, it can create an enormous amount of money via box offices and selling merchandise. Blockbusters like "Avengers: Endgame" are evidence for this. Another art form that is able to make great monetary value is music. In this digitalized era, listeners tend to purchase songs and albums on popular streaming platforms such as Spotify and Apple Music, and hits can bring about huge profits.
The second reason for spending money on arts is their indirect contribution to the tourism industry. Exhibitions and art museums are among the most attractive destinations in foreign tourists' eyes. Visitors tend to love exploring cultural aspects of the natives through museums and performances. Such attractions should be well invested in terms of maintenance and improvement so that they appeal to more tourists. By doing so, not only does it enrich the macroeconomy but also the cultural heritage.
Those who do not find love for arts may contend that spending money on other fields such as education and medicines is more urgent and more necessary. In their opinion, the arts are not a sine qua non for the socioeconomy. However, it is false to follow that idea since commercialized contemporary arts are proven to be as equally crucial as every other segment of the economy. The arts have been an essential part of the development of humankind throughout history, therefore it demands that they be conservated and enhanced as well as financially utilized.
In conclusion, with the aforementioned arguments, I believe that the authorities should remain interested in the arts and their monetary potential, not downplaying their impacts on society.
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this argument 84
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17355371901 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93941072129 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589531680441 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4749473482 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8421052632 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202186474051 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551297310103 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424841526787 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103881256646 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427538344954 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17355371901 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93941072129 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589531680441 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4749473482 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8421052632 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202186474051 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551297310103 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424841526787 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103881256646 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427538344954 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.