Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Perhaps the greatest threat to the world is not the atomic bombs, the regional conflicts, terrorism, an outbreak of population or political instability but the climate change and environmental degradation. If we do not address this greatest danger properly, we will be responsible for our own extinction, and I do not believe that we should let it happen by doing nothing about it.
To begin with, the rising temperature, Arctic ice melt, deforestation, uncontrolled industrialization, air pollution and depletion of the ozone layer are all connected and would lead to a single event- the destruction of the world. We have already harmed the environment to a great extent and the time has come for all nations to work together to reduce the environmental damage. The sudden flood in the USA, intense storm in Asia, unpredictable droughts in Africa are all resulting from climate change and this change is occurring rapidly than ever before. If we let this continue, the future would be even more perilous. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, consequences of climate changes include the increased intensity of storms including tropical cyclones, increased risks of drought and, wetter Asian monsoon, and, possibly, more intense mid-latitude storms. According to a recent report, global warming would cause sea levels to rise up to 4 feet by 2100 and many countries including some South Asian countries would suffer greatly from that.
The last thing the human should do to turn a blind eye to this imminent problem and learn to live with it, of course, unless we want the termination of the human race, that would be a whole different issue. There is a lot to do and we should start implementing regional cooperation right now. Every individual should contribute by emitting fewer fumes and planting as many trees as possible while the use of fossil fuel should be globally prohibited. Industrial countries have more responsibilities as they contribute more to environmental degradation and an international panel should be formed by giving it a supreme power to make any legislation to kerb the environmental damages.
To conclude, for our existence on Mother Earth, we should take immediate actions both at individual and international levels to check climate change. Otherwise, we will fail to save our planet and future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Amarul Azmi | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | Nhun Nhun | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | bnhanh02 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | Hangphan02 | 73 | view |
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents 73
- As a result of electronic inventions such as computer and television people do less physical activities and this is having a negative effect on their health To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people prefer to help or support directly in the local community for people who need it however others prefer to give money to the national or private charities Discuss both views and give your own opinions 78
- Some people think the government should spend money to look for life on other planets others think it is a waste of public money because there are other problems unsolved on earth Discuss both view and give your own opinion 73
- In some countries parents expect children to spend long time studying in and after school and have less free time Do you think it has positive or negative effects on children and society that they live in 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, of course, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23947368421 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10067792605 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5814054681 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.214285714 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157680772098 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532901620616 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355334551499 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953041200681 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312366155541 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.