Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today, it is agreed that the change of atmosphere should be prevented, while it is also true that finding a solution to adapt with this situation is needed to live. However, the latter statement is not the viable solution to tackle this climate issue.
Nowadays, the way to find an adaptation of climate alternation to live on the Earth has been revealed by experts, using advanced technology. Thanks to current research, many people can cope with this severe condition by creating artificial weather so that they do not worry to detrimental effect of global warming, causing food scarcity. For instance, the USA scientists have discovered drone technology to increase intensity of precipitation artificially since 2019, this prevention has solved the reduction of agricultural production in that period as the harm result of high-rise temperature globally. Nevertheless, it is not viable because this solution only offers short-term solution, and is not able to halt the global heating process.
Nonetheless, overcoming climate alternation to do environmental conservation is a best agreement. This is because, if people still waste the nature, the heat rise considerably, and the long-term demerit originates the edge of human extinction because waste causes the greenhouse effect, warming our beloved planet. For example, Indonesia in 2020 was the third rank country producing the most amount of waste disposal, being one of the major contributors generating the greenhouse gases about 15%. When this problem is not tackled, the human-being can be predicted to vanish in 200 years later.
In conclusion, it is true that people should conserve the surroundings instead of researching a remedy to live under this hot atmosphere. Where possible, people do not waste in the environment to stop the warming of the Earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ion to do environmental conservation is a best agreement. This is because, if peo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, third, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38461538462 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01107220468 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629370629371 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1499974351 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175970176857 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636311787006 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585632404404 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113481292063 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479721641914 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.