Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give you own opinion.
There has been a controversy about the purpose of museums. Some people said that museums should be made to entertain people while others argue that they are supposed to be educational places. My opinion is that it will be better if museums could be both educational and entertaining.
On the one hand, many people believe that the main role of museums is to entertain. Museums are places where many artefacts are showcased and past events are told. That said, people can feel bored when just reading and listening to historical content. So it is important for museums to perform interesting activities and games relating to these events. For instance, they can do a quiz about historical events and include rewards for right answers. That way people will definitely be more interested in the exhibition and they can both have fun and learn new things while doing these activities.
On the other hand, it can be argued that education should be the main aim of museums. People usually do not know about the story behind those relics and past events in the exhibition. That's why documentaries and professional guides are needed to explain thoroughly to the visitors. This will give people insights into historical events and museums will play a vital role in teaching people about culture and history.
To conclude, I believe that museums should offer an interesting and enjoyable experience for people while also provide them educational knowledge as well. In that way museums will definitely attract more visitors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-20 | Tường Vân | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | linhdung01 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Hanabi | 87 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | Truong Thanh Tuyen | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000 87
- The chart below shows the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projections till 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 wo
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The Pie chart below shows the average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be both educational and entertaining. On the one hand, many people believe tha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...lics and past events in the exhibition. Thats why documentaries and professional guid...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.092 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64765254518 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2688678388 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.8666666667 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421006641104 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137545450456 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114483035688 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28223554389 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101673295145 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be both educational and entertaining. On the one hand, many people believe tha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...lics and past events in the exhibition. Thats why documentaries and professional guid...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.092 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64765254518 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2688678388 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.8666666667 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421006641104 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137545450456 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114483035688 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28223554389 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101673295145 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.