Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is an ongoing controversy regarding whether altering occupations regularly or sticking to a job helps people experience a sense of satisfaction. Although I partly agree that continuing doing a profession would be beneficial in some facets, I would align myself with the notion that those changing their occupations tend to have a happier career life.
On the one hand, it is indisputable that keeping doing a job might have some auspicious effects on the career paths of workers. Firstly, sticking to a profession helps individuals to handle strenuous works effectively and easily. This is because they have accumulated hands-on experience through years of working in this job. Therefore, these workers are capable of being promoted to higher positions and gaining the trust of bosses thanks to what they have contributed to spur the development of their companies. Furthermore, those who prefer to pursue an occupation tend to feel comfortable when working in light of the fact that they have been accustomed to their working environment. Thereby, should they switch their jobs, they will struggle with adjusting to new environments, which hinders them from dedicating their endeavors to their corporations.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling justifications convincing me to advocate that changing professions could help worker feel satisfied. The first reason stems from the fact that this practice serves such a fundamental role in assisting workers in finding jobs offering higher salaries to them. For example, numerous people living in rural areas are inclined to give up the job as a peasant and head to metropolis like Ho Chi Minh City or Ha Noi to work in large corporations. As a result, they could earn more money, which helps them to be sufficient in financial conditions to make ends meet. Moreover, altering occupations regularly might be quite conducive for workers to acquire more real-life experience because they are able to approach to new working environments, where they are required tackle a great number of different tasks. Hence, they need to cultivate more skills in order to complete their works, which is useful for them to be proficient in distinct occupations.
In conclusion, explicitly, it cannot be denied that employees are capable of deriving the benefits of carrying on working a profession; nevertheless, I want to affirm that it is desirable for them to switch occupations frequently to experience the feeling of satisfaction. In addition, from my perspective, in order to feel happy with career paths, individuals ought to try all their best to attain remarkab
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ations. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling justifications convincing...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25653206651 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00644099175 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553444180523 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3984105331 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.3125 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3125 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155850847544 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051327345196 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523408580371 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981789653002 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560639095823 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ations. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling justifications convincing...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25653206651 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00644099175 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553444180523 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3984105331 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.3125 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3125 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155850847544 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051327345196 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523408580371 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981789653002 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560639095823 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.