Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion? Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Children are the future of the country and the things they learn in their childhood are important. Some people argue that cooking and preparing food though not as delicious as prepared in restaurant shall be known by the students, while the others say that the school time should be utilized in learning important subjects and concepts. Although I feel that students should focus and learn important subjects in the school time, a student should spend some time learning the science of the food and how to prepare them.
Firstly knowing the science of the food one of the most important things for a better health and well being. A person can eat unhealthy food not knowing its science and implications and end up getting serious diseases. For example many of the companies market their products are organic or as healthy whereas the contents printed at the back of the product state otherwise. If a person looks at the contents of the product and has some knowledge about the ingredients then he/she can choose the right product. Many of the popular foods in India contain MSG which is one of the most harmful ingredient for the human body. Though the companies market their products in a beautiful and attractive manner, if a person knows about the product then person can make a choice of buying or not buying the product. Knowing how to preparing food is also important for a person to be independent. Although a person can eat at restaurants or food joints, knowing how to cook food gives them an added advantage. For example, if a student who is going to USA for his masters degree knows how to cook food he/she can save a lot of money which otherwise would be spent at restaurants. The person can also save a lot of time because the person does not have to go to another place to have food and also a lot of time is saved by not having to decide where to go to have food.
Secondly the student must focus on learning important subjects as they are necessary for a better career of the student. Students should discover what they like and what interests them the most in school and try to read about that. Student has a lot of time and fewer responsibilities so they should focus on their studies. For example if a student has interest in computers then he/she shall start learning about that subject. The knowledge gained in the school will also help the student to accelerate their career growth.
To conclude I feel that the student shall learn subjects during the school time as they help them in the future and increase the knowledge of the kids. Knowing the science of the food and preparing them can be learned in the later years as well. They don't require significant time in a single day but require the person to study and learn about them continuously. Nowadays a person can easily learn to cook food by looking at the recipes on the internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...earned in the later years as well. They dont require significant time in a single da...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, while, for example, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2360.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 510.0 315.596192385 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62745098039 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4414686021 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4 0.561755894193 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 705.6 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0555399538 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.272727273 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273446380959 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973232135602 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848531619321 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204116317089 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098148433467 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.