Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant ex

Essay topics:

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion? Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

There is little room for doubt that education is of paramount significance in our contemporary society; however, the issue of what should be taught at school always remains a source of constant debate. While it is thought that children should be educated about food science, some people suppose schools are the places for students to study compulsory subjects. I side with those believing that the science of food should become another mandatory subject at school.
Without a shadow of a doubt, some compulsory subjects which are currently included in the studying curriculum play an cardially important in the development of a child. In particular, lessons concerning natural science, namely maths, physics, biology, and so forth, provide students with a wide range of expertise on calculation and factual phenomena in life. Besides, without basic knowledge of literature and history, posterity could not fully comprehend how undaunting and heroic their ancestors were. Therefore, students are always incentivized to enrich various fields of knowledge at school.
Besides, students are advised to have in-depth understanding of food science. Only by researching the role, the source, and the diversity of the food, can children comprehend the importance of food, thereby gradually having proper ways of consuming and conserving the food. Regarding the nutrition, from the lessons teachers deliver, students may themselves opt for vegetable and meat to consume, having significant and beneficial repercussions on their health. Besides, from vivid videos and photos about the hunger in some poverty-stricken areas across the world within a lesson, teachers can edify the students how to properly utilize the food and beverage, precluding them from wasting dishes and fruits. There is little room for doubt that education is of paramount significance in our contemporary society; however, the issue of what should be taught at school always remains a source of constant debate. While it is thought that children should be educated about food science, some people suppose schools are the places for students to study compulsory subjects. I side with those believing that the science of food should become another mandatory subject at school.
From the points enlisted above, it is essential that every student absorb basic knowlegde about food. Therefore, schools are advised to include food science in the default studying curriculum.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-16 quan12341234 61 view
2023-08-08 kphuong1901 89 view
2023-08-08 kphuong1901 89 view
2023-08-08 kphuong1901 61 view
2023-08-08 kphuong1901 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ncluded in the studying curriculum play an cardially important in the development ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51871657754 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79968357943 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489304812834 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3708859045 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245834995519 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955674221841 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626371614153 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163864783324 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559779010917 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.