Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant ex

Essay topics:

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

It is arguable that the science of food and how to prepare it should not be included in school curriculum for the reason that more important subjects need to be prioritized. Each point of view has its own benefits and drawbacks, which are discussed in this essay.
Science of food is regarded as a proper topic to be introduced to school lessons as it acknowledges and helps students to take care of themselves and their families by teaching them how to prepare healthy meals. For example, a student going to college will deal better with an independent life if they are conscious of cooking and eating healthy food, especially when young people usually prefer fast food and constant noodles due to their convenience. Moreover, knowledge of nutrition gives students opportunities to plan their own diets in order to keep fit, or improve their mental and physical health, or change their appearances for the better, more importantly, students do care about their outlooks in teenage years .
On the other hand, learning one more subject as science of food and how to prepare it seems overwhelming to some students. School life should be spent for studying and doing extracurricular activities, which contributes to a good profile to enter colleges. Nowadays students have more choices whether to study overseas or in their countries, which is the reason why studying must receive the most attention. Science of food and how to prepare it seems useful, but could be grasped at a different time after graduation.
In conclusion, studying science of food and how to prepare it has its pros and cons, and it is up to each individual to determine whether it worth spending time for or not. In my opinion, science of food and how to prepare it should be brought to school because it provides life skills for students to lead independent and healthy lives.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-16 quan12341234 61 view
2023-08-08 kphuong1901 89 view
2023-08-08 kphuong1901 89 view
2023-08-08 kphuong1901 61 view
2023-08-08 kphuong1901 78 view
Essays by user tessa :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 714, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re about their outlooks in teenage years On the other hand learning one more subj...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84345047923 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66313046609 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527156549521 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 313.0 20.2975951904 1542% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1516.0 106.682146367 1421% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 313.0 20.7667163134 1507% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 89.0 7.06120827912 1260% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364545372038 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.364545372038 0.084324248473 432% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242246868797 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624898799383 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 157.9 13.0946893788 1206% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -237.76 50.2224549098 -473% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 124.2 11.3001002004 1099% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.27 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.24 8.58950901804 259% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 127.2 10.1190380762 1257% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 158.0 10.7795591182 1466% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.