Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether scholars should study every subject on the schools' programs or focus only on those which interest them the most. To this day, students still have to attend every class, and I agree with the importance of this system due to several reasons that I will discuss in greater details further in the essay.
On one side of the argument, there are people who suggest keeping the schools' system untouched to offer complete education. Many students have to study every academic subject, and this offers them the possibility to enter the colleges or universities they choose because they received a well-rounded education. A second point is that many job positions require not only professional skills, which are learned with specific courses, but also good general knowledge. A particularly good example here is the diversity of subjects that are inserted into admission tests for paramedics figures such as nursing or midwifery school. Even though biology and chemistry have the largest number of questions, others continue to belong to maths and physics. Thus, it goes without saying that this point of view is realistic and general knowledge is fundamental in adults' lives.
On the other hand, some other people believe that their children should only focus on what they are good at, or the subjects they are more interested in, to excel and not waste precious time. However, this suggestion would lead to incomplete knowledge for most kids, who would feel left out in many fields. Sectorial learning, which can sound appealing for teenagers, would give them the possibility of choosing among all the subjects proposed those in which they have better grades. This way, most of the scholars would miss out on important notions such as, for example, the basis of a second language, or some of the most notorious discoveries of all history.
After having discussed the most pertinent point of this issue, I feel that the only logical conclusion is that the advantages brought on by a well-rounded education outweigh the disadvantages. Hence, I am inclined to the opinion that the actual school's system is the optimal choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...here are people who suggest keeping the schools system untouched to offer complete educ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...inclined to the opinion that the actual schools system is the optimal choice.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, second, so, still, thus, well, for example, i feel, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10055865922 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61912287328 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567039106145 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.4615222216 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.428571429 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262027090282 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812248931751 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964653198518 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142400840962 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790824344174 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.