Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people Discuss the advantages and disadvantages

Essay topics:

Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages.

There is a view that strict legal restrictions should be imposed on the quantity of noise which an individual produces because it disturbs other people. This essay will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of regulating noise made by people.
On the one hand, there are some advantages of controlling noise with laws. Firstly, it is beneficial for education. Students’ concentration is significantly disturbed by the noise coming from a place outside schools, such as construction sites or motorways. Therefore, the governmental regulation of noise will help them study more comfortably and efficiently. Secondly, it is also advantageous from the viewpoint of health care. Continual loud noise can be harmful to people’s ear, deteriorating hearing. Moreover, it often disturbs sleep, which makes people exhausted. This can be the cause of mental health problems such as depression. These physical and mental health problems can be prevented by restricting noise legally.
On the other hand, the disadvantages of noise regulation are that it can have a negative influence on people’s life and the local economy. In order to secure the tranquil environment for many people, the government needs to keep a large-scale development accompanying loud noise away from urban areas which include a large population. This can render residents’ life more inconvenient due to the lack of renewal of infrastructure, making the city less attractive. As a result, the number of residents can decrease considerably, which leads to stagnation in the local economy.
In conclusion, the upsides of controlling noise generated by people are that it can affect education and citizen’s health negatively, while the downsides are unfavorable effects on residents’ convenience and the local economy.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-09 hieu13092006 78 view
2021-08-17 anna103 73 view
2021-08-17 anna103 11 view
2021-08-17 anna103 73 view
2021-08-17 anna103 73 view
Essays by user AkiraM :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56043956044 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22875436578 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575091575092 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9461819737 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.875 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281297503476 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875522281428 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655405900906 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157731518943 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660537572996 0.056905535591 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56043956044 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22875436578 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575091575092 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9461819737 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.875 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281297503476 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875522281428 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655405900906 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157731518943 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660537572996 0.056905535591 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.